The U.S. Army tries Positive Psychology . . . but does it work?

Monday’s Washington Post had an article about a new U. S. Army program called Comprehensive Soldier Fitness, which is designed to “to make soldiers more psychologically ‘resilient’ amid the pressures of combat, repeated deployments, and family and financial crises.”

Martin Seligman, the father of Positive Psychology, helped design the program, which attempts to instill optimism and the ability to handle stress.  According to the Post, the program has come under fire by other psychologists, who have had two main criticisms:  First, that we don’t know whether the program works, and it is possible that it may do more harm than good.  Second, that it is a giant research project that violates established ethical guidelines, for example, by not obtaining the consent of the soldiers to participate.

I worry more about the first point more than the second.  In fact, I think that the Army and Seligman haven’t gone far enough in conducting rigorous research on whether the program works.  As far as I know, there is no control group that doesn’t get the intervention, making it impossible to tell for sure what its effects will be.  As I detail in my new book, Redirect:  The Surprising New Science of Psychological Change, many interventions designed to help people go untested, and when researchers do get around to testing them, the interventions are often found to be ineffective or to do more harm than good (think of the D.A.R.E. anti-drug program).  In the Army’s case, they could have conducted an experimental test in which volunteers were randomly assigned to take part in the program or not, to find out exactly what benefits (if any) the program has, while following established ethical guidelines for research.  Surely this would be better than subjecting a million soldiers to an untested program.

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

3 responses to “The U.S. Army tries Positive Psychology . . . but does it work?

  1. cynicism is so unseemly, so I apologize, but since this is being done in preparation for deployment isn’t this more about keeping bodies on-line than about making for a healthy life in spite of horrific experiences?

  2. Rebecca Moldover

    first of all, looking forward to reading your new book….but to the present point..it does seem a controlled study would ensure the integrity of results, and I’m a fan of emotional resiliency, but I wonder about resiliency to what.?..hopefully not to injustice or atrocity which seems all to common in war…if resiliency means acceptance, this is troubling..if it means mustering the strength and inner integrity to fight such things, than I think it’s a very hopeful effort…I have a grim picture of Hitler holding “positive psychology” sessions for his S.S men……

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s